Monday, December 23, 2019
Comparing Fairbairn s Motivation Behind His Departure...
nd contrast Fairbairnââ¬â¢s motivation behind his departure from Freudââ¬â¢s structural model and development of object relationââ¬â¢s theory Introduction It is widely accepted that Sigmund Freud coined the term Psychoanalysis. Within this he derived a number of models over the period of his life to explain how the psyche operates and from where trauma originates, which subsequently led to the development of psychoanalysis. Ronald Fairbairn was a lecturer at the University of Edinburgh teaching medicine where he incorporated his extensive knowledge of Freudââ¬â¢s structural model in his lectures. It was during this time that uncertainties provoked Fairbairn to questions the accuracy of the structural model and initiated Fairbairnââ¬â¢s quest to find an alternative theory, which later led to him becoming one of the key contributors to Object relations theory along side, Melanie Klein, and D.W Winnicott. (Object relations theory and practice An introduction, David E. Scharff, pg 5 1996) This essay will compare and contrast some of the key reasons for Fairbairnââ¬â¢s departure from Freudââ¬â¢s Structural model and drive theory and look at the theory behind object relations and how it is used in therapy today. The Pleasure principle Freudââ¬â¢s structural model illustrates that within every individual there is tripartite structure consisting of the Id, Ego and Super Ego. Freud argued that an individualââ¬â¢s instinctual drive was sexually orientated. In the same way that ââ¬Å"hunger seeks nutrition,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.